5:49PM EST October 9. 2012 – Roger Goodell is budging — but just a bit.
The NFL Commissioner re-issued penalties Tuesday for the four players disciplined in the New Orleans Saints bounty scandal, and after a series of appeals, questions about the league’s evidence and a pending defamation suit brought forward by Jonathan Vilma, the punishment stemming from the pay-to-injure program has been tweaked.
Vilma, the New Orleans Saints linebacker who would have been eligible to return from the physically-unable-to-perform list this week, is still essentially suspended for the season.
But he gets to keep the six game checks due for his time on the PUP list.
Scott Fujita, now a Cleveland Browns linebacker, is suspended for one game after originally being docked for three games.
Anthony Hargrove, a defensive tackle without a team, had his suspension reduced by a game to seven gamers, but receives credit for time served during the five weeks he has been a free agent. If he is re-signed by a team, he must miss two games.
The four-game suspension for Saints defensive end Will Smith is unchanged.
Goodell was ordered to reconsider the punishment after a three-member panel of judges, hearing an appeal by the NFL Players Association (NFLPA), temporarily lifted the suspensions on Sept. 7, but affirmed the Commissioner’s authority to discipline players for “conduct detrimental to the game.”
Before reaching his decision, Goodell met with each of the disciplined players within the past two weeks. Such meetings never occurred before the original punishment was announced in May, with the league contending that the players refused to cooperate and the players charging that the league’s investigation and process was faulty.
“The quality, specificity and scope of the evidence supporting the findings of conduct detrimental are far greater and more extensive than ordinarily available in such cases,” Goodell wrote in a memo the NFL clubs.
“In my recent meetings with the players and their counsel, the players addressed the allegations and had an opportunity to tell their side of the story. In those meetings, the players confirmed many of the key facts disclosed in our investigation, most particularly that the program offered cash rewards for ‘cart-offs,’ that players were encouraged to ‘crank up the John Deere tractor’ and have their opponents carted off the field, and that rewards were offered and paid for plays that resulted in opposing players having to leave the field of play.”
The players can appeal the discipline again to Goodell or pursue more court action, including a federal case that the NFLPA filed on behalf of the three players separate from Vilma. And it’s still unclear whether Vilma will revise the legal strategy that resulted in his defamation case against Goodell.